🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are watching with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of states are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban is "a potential options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to approve a proposal lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged families to block their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is provided. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the move does not establish binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a useful foundation," stated one parliamentarian driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by robust data".

Earlier, support gathered behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after viewing dangerous social media material contends that a strict age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to create products and services that are secure and suitable for young users," said a prominent peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, action is mostly occurring at the state level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures demanding adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from various politicians to follow the Australian example, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Beyond the West, additional states are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more nuanced position. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in safety.

As this global conversation continues, the steps of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are no longer prepared to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.