🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.